canon 135mm f2 astrophotography

Hey Trevor, great article! (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. The focuser adjustment ring on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is excellent, but fine-tuning your critical focus on a bright star at F/2 will take some trial and error to get right. We revisit a classic DPReviewTV episode in which Chris Niccolls and Jordan Drake shoot a few rolls of Fujifilm's Acros 100 II, and a few frames on the X-T3 in Acros film simulation, to find out. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? At f/32, it's pretty soft, but less so than a lot of lenses at that aperture. Sharp without being harsh. Again, there's no context. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. OM System's latest lens is a whopper of a macro, featuring optical stabilization, full weather sealing, up to 2x magnification and a whole lot more. No telephoto lens can be used with cameras modified by the removal of the internal UV/IR cut filter and anti-aliasing filter. BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? It also focuses really fast and accurate and is light. $218.00 for 7 days. Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. Thanks.. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. Available 03/21/23. Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) Besides lack of IS, the only major issue I have with this lens is flare. If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? When you shoot a 135mm F2 lens at F2, your subject will stand out in this beautiful way, often without much work needed from you as the photographer. One is its size and weight, which requires a sturdy support on the telescope. He's better than I am on BS, I got to give him that. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . Backwards compatible (film). I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. http://www.idyll.com/laneysat Tiring. Round one of polls are now open, pick your winners and share your voice. I cant wait to try this lens out during the winter months on some wide-field targets in Orion. (AVX). I hope that this post has provided some practical insight into a popular camera lens for astrophotography. But you raise the exact point, that primes should be chosen with a 2x factor. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. wew.. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. But she might as well be in front of a green screen. Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: SharpStar Askar ACL200 200-mm f/4 astrographic telephoto lens, Astrotrac 360 tracking platform first impression, FIELD TEST: CARL ZEISS APOCHROMATIC & SHARPEST (CZAS) BINOVIEWER, Deus_Ex_Mamiya and Michael Covington like this. The Andromeda Galaxy using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? I'm not a fan of the large hood. I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. I hear great things about the Canon 200/2.8 L but do not have one. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble. Your first serious portrait lens should be a modern stabilized 70-200 f/2.8. Some people may disagree with the vignetting being a good thing or not, but thats a matter of taste I guess. It must not be confused with the much cheaper SMC Takumar, often deceptively advertised as SMC Pentax Takumar, which has the M42 camera thread, and is plagued with unextinguishable blue chromatic aberration. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. Sme of the wide field are. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. Really, just an amazing lens, easily worth the $800-900 it commands on the street. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ?? You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Simple as that! This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. With weather sealing this would be a 10. I have had a blast with a samyang, but a used 135mm f2.8 is VERY . I speak Japanese fluently, was a translator in Tokyo for 8 years and studied photography there for two years. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. Technical Specifications Looking for specific info? Available Monday. Of course headline central sharpness is great, that is what grabs headlines, always shot at f2: any 135mm lens is going to give similar results. Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. I was expecting a lot more of an article that says "the best telephoto lenses for astrophotography". OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/314771597/ Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. It's a trade off. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. Here is a short list of great astrophotography targets to shoot at 135mm with this lens: Below, is an incredible example of the types of projects possible with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 lens. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. I really don't want to count all the pores - and the hairs coming out of them (eeeew!) Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. But for me, the reason to get this lens is the Bokeh and DOF control. Samyang 135mm F/2 ED UMC Review (Camera Labs), Does a F/2.0 lens become F/2.8 when used on a crop sensor camera? One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! Will this ever get old? Yes the Samyang is good and yes there are lenses with bad bokeh. Smooth but contrasty. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. First of all, the background separation and the bokeh: I had photographed lots of animals in bushes before, but never before had I seen the bush melt away in the way it did with the 135mm lens. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. We think it rises to the challenge. I just got the Samyang version of this lens and used it with my Canon 3ti on a Skywatcher Star Adventurer. CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. if you compare images taken with this lens to those from a 105mm f1.8 ais or a cosina 125mm and you'll see what i mean. People mistake "Bokeh" to blurry background, what is very very common mistake. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. CANON LENS FOR ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. Juksu, your point is well taken. Super sharp from f2. Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. In fact, it might be fun to try! On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. The downsides of this configuration are that shooting wide open can make focusing difficult. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). Nice image, andysea. Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. ", I'd no problem with that. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. I would! 200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. The only downside with that lens is that it is manual focus, which might not be suitable for photographing sports or children. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. When stopped down to 49mm it really is indistinguishable from an APO, except it shows red chromatic aberration with modified cameras even with the UV/IR block or CLS-CCD filter. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. A lot of us have been saying this for years. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. I would never shell out hundreds of euros for a 135 prime let alone one with manual focus. The author's recipe for a good photo is:1) Just shoot blindly, with no regard to what's in the frame, because the lens will blur away everything on the background.2) If (1) does not work, just head on to https://www.bhphotovideo.com, download a jpg of the lens you were using, and photoshop it on top of the taillaits of the passig car that didn't get blurred out enough.3?) But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count. Heh, it's amazing how far Samyang has come since this article (I'm loving their 45 & 75 f1.8), and kinda amusing that they ended up delivering exactly what you asked for Kinda reminds me of that article by Roger Cicala about how long lens development takes. I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. I use it for everything, landscapes, townscapes, interesting detail, portraits. Definitely now on my to-buy list. It's March, and in America that means it's time to start arguing over which college athletics team is the best at basketball. Stopping down would actually have improved the picture. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. Read on to find out which you should be using and why! Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. Aperture ring. - in my subjects' skin. The rest are relatively uncreative, and just seem lame to me. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with ED standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the ultra multi-coated optics. Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. Sure, not all 135mm lenses are lightweightSigma's new 135mm F1.8 is rather heavy at 1130gbut if you look at the Samyang 135mm F2, which is pretty much flawless optically, it weighs only 830g. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. The flawless image quality is only half the story though. Oh yes, and it leads to lusting after other primes! Canon 135mm is a great lens. The thing is, on my APS-C body the 100mm is challenging enough. As you know, camera lenses come in varying focal lengths, apertures, and optical quality. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. This thing is a beast in comparison. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. If You can afford it, buy it! This is so annoying that I intend to replace the Canon lens cap with a Tamron cap. I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. Better than nothing I guess, would depend on how much it raises the price. Of my last 3500 shots only 62 were made with the 135 f/2. Why so salty? USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/01/canon-135mm-f2l-usm-mini-review.html The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. I stopped reading after the part where someone I don't know told me I "should" be doing something. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. You will get perfectly round star images if you use an aperture stop in front of the lens made of a series of filter thread step-down rings. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. it is crisp, fast, and awsome. There is no such thing, in my opinion. Prime lenses are typically lighter as they do not need the additional glass and mechanics required to zoom at varying magnifications. Thanks, The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. There have been a lot of Tele-Tessars over the years. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. Another example is the 100mm (or sometimes 90mm) F2.8 macro lens. Does the bright star reflection bother you? To remedy this, I reduced the star size in post, and I started shooting at F/4 to really tighten things up. As a complete beginner in Astrophotography should I buy Rokinon 135mm lens or Canon EF 75-300mm lens with Canon EF 50mm lens? I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. Check out By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. thanks for the tiring patronising lecture and then agreeing with me. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. I disagree. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. My first shot was a section of the constellation Sagittarius that included the Lagoon Nebula, and Trifid Nebula. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? You can't really ask them to stand still while you move around. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. Helps me as a beginner a lot Here's what I see from the photographs:#1: Woman in traffic. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. Aside from being much more affordable, telephoto lenses are easier to transport, easier to mount and easier to guide, and are much more likely to produce encouraging results to a beginner. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there.

Best Day For Surgery Astrology 2021, Laborers Pension Trust Fund, Class 10a Building Regulations Victoria, Jennifer Holliday Parents, Articles C