ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefisteven fogarty father
Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Yes. Installation & Boot. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. If you did the above as described, exactly, then you now have a good Ventoy install of latest version, but /dev/sdX1 will be type exFAT and we want to change that to ext4, so start gparted, find that partition (make sure it is unmounted via right click in gparted), format it to ext4 and make sure to . I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? I didn't try install using it though. What exactly is the problem? If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. Level 1. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB How to Fix No bootfile found for UEFI on a Laptop or Desktop PC - YouTube DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). When the user select option 1. Ventoy Forums 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. Exactly. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . sharafat.pages.dev I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. and leave it up to the user. 4. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. privacy statement. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Have a question about this project? Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. What system are you booting from? size: 589 (617756672 byte) I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. Help It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. las particiones seran gpt, modo bios If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. Well occasionally send you account related emails. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. MediCAT Now, that one can currently break the trust chain somewhere down the line, by inserting a malicious program at the first level where the trust stops being validated, which, incidentally, as a method (since I am NOT calling Ventoy malicious here) is very similar to what Ventoy is doing for Windows boot, is irrelevant to the matter, because one can very much conceive an OS that is being secured all the way (and, once again, if Microsoft were to start doing just that, then that would most likely mark the end of being able to use Ventoy with Windows ISOs since it would no longer be able to inject an executable that isn't signed by Microsoft as part of the boot process) and that validates the signature of every single binary it runs along the way which means that the trust chain needs to start somewhere and (as far as user providable binaries are concerned) that trust chain starts with Secure Boot. For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. accomodate this. Many thousands of people use Ventoy, the website has a list of tested ISOs. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Nierewa Junior Member. 4 Ways to Fix Ventoy if It's Not Working [Booting Issues] Asks for full pathname of shell. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. Windows 7 UEFI64 Install - Easy2Boot md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Then I can directly add them to the tested iso list on Ventoy website. | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. All other distros can not be booted. Will it boot fine? Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. Yes. Is there any progress about secure boot support? Please follow the guid bellow. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. So I apologise for that. Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. I thought that Secure Boot chain of trust is reused for TPM key sealing, but thinking about it more, that wouldn't really work. I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. Sign in Thanks! 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. You can grab latest ISO files here : You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). Already have an account? Just found that MEMZ.iso from https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA works, file: Windows XP.ver.SP3.English This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. Do I still need to display a warning message? Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. () no boot file found for uefi. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! Any suggestions, bugs? Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. @chromer030 hello. Besides, I'm considering that: openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB I think it's OK. *lil' bow* ISO file name (full exact name) see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Ventoy No Boot File Found For Uefi - My Blog Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). It does not contain efi boot files. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. gsrd90 New Member. Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Failed to Install, Please refer When Ventoy2Disk.exe Fail to Update, Yes. SecureBoot - Debian Wiki Will there be any? However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. Both are good. 5. extservice Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. Won't it be annoying? And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. check manjaro-gnome, not working. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? Of course , Added. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. list vol - select vol of EFI (in my case nr 14) as illustrated - assign - EFI drive is mounted as Q: Also possible is: After booting with Win10XPE from RAMDISK the Hidden EFI Driv Solved: Cannot boot from UEFI USB - HP Support Community - 6634212 New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Legacy? https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat If someone has physical access to a system then Secure Boot is useless period. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). My guess is it does not. P.S. After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. You signed in with another tab or window. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you.